Fri 29 Aug 2008
Barack Obama Accepts Nomination for President of The United States
Posted by Andrew Blanco under Current Events, History, Politics
In a speech that will be taught in American History classes for centuries to come, Senator Barack Obama laid out in specific detail how his vision of change will transform the direction that American society is moving. Speaking directly to hundreds of millions of television viewers around the globe, Obama forcefully proclaimed that after eight years of destructive politics there is nothing left to say but “Enough”.
In a call to arms he challenged his opponent Senator John McCain to defend his self-proclaimed identity as a maverick. Obama used simple logic to explain what it would mean to truly be a political maverick in the Senate, and why voting for 90% of Bush Administration policies violates the definition of a maverick, and violates the very notion of what it means to be an independent thinker.
However, without violating his own campaign call to transcend bipartisan politics, Obama also emphasized that there is no place in this election to accuse either candidate of loving their country more than another, or of being more patriotic than another. He instead looked directly into the camera, reminding Americans that we all love this country regardless of our party affiliations. He reminded us that outside of the competitive games of intellectual one upmanship there is no such thing as a Liberal or a Conservative. There is no such thing as a Democrat or a Republican. There are only Americans who love their country; though varied are the expressions of that love of State.
Most importantly, Barack Obama reminded us that what his nay-sayers have failed to see is that this election, and his meteoric rise to the pinnacle of American and world politics, has never been about him.
It has instead been about an entire People’s call for change. It has been about a People’s frustration that a two-term president and his administration have spent the seven years following the worst attacks on American soil squandering tax payers dollars by increasing dependence on an unrenewable energy that is provided by countries that foster the very ideology that inspired those very attacks.
It has been about a People’s frustration that their leaders, their greatest and most prominent representatives, have spent the last seven years following the worst attacks on American soil acting more as models of stubborn resistance than as ambassadors of change. In a democracy, calls for change can only go denied for so long. Barack Obama didn’t create the movement for change, he is just its most prominent ambassador.
In this coming election the choice is not between Barack Obama and John McCain. The choice isn’t even between Liberal and Conservative, or Republican and Democrat. No, this election we vote for either Change or Stagnation.
And remember, no matter what happens come November 2008, it won’t be long before you will be old and grey, and fondly recalling to your grandchildren how you were witness to history, and the fulfillment of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s legacy and life’s work.
Image courtesy of TopNews

August 29th, 2008 at 7:30 pm
My favorite part of the speech is something that (amazingly) nobody is discussing.
All week the McCain camp (and by extension punditry folks like Hannity) has been referring to Senator Obama as “Apollo” for the column motif of the speech. During the speech, Mr. Obama spun the Apollo notion and gave himself an Apollo-esque challenge: Remove our dependence on foreign oil in 10 years.
August 29th, 2008 at 8:10 pm
I forget their name, but a commentator on MSNBC compared Obama’s oil challenge to John F. Kennedy’s challenge to send an American to the moon in ten years.
August 29th, 2008 at 11:05 pm
The stage was certainly a statement in and of itself.
August 30th, 2008 at 10:22 am
I still say douche and turd. You can dress it up as much as you want but its still the same two guys as always who will suck and do nothing.
August 30th, 2008 at 5:17 pm
Claire,
What would it take for someone to run for president and not come off as a douche and turd?
August 30th, 2008 at 5:30 pm
Andrew,
Obama uses the same genreal “change for our children” bull that the democratic party has been shoveling for decades.
How is a community organizer supposed to solve an energy crisis in one decade that an army of engineers and scientists say will take 20 years at best?
Simply put - he can’t - he’s full of it.
August 30th, 2008 at 5:45 pm
Voting “Present” never CHANGED anything, Mr. Obama.
August 30th, 2008 at 7:38 pm
Seriously, what has Obama done as a Freshman Senator in Illinois besides use it as a platform to run for president.
August 30th, 2008 at 8:04 pm
In other news, Barack Obama recently called a press conference after the Senator from Illinois brought change to a vending machine in Denver.
August 30th, 2008 at 10:41 pm
Jack,
Don’t pretend we live in a dictatorship. If we did I wouldn’t be voting for Obama as he severely lacks experience in foreign relations. However as you and I both know, though as you seem to forever ignore in all your comments about politics - an administration is a team, and the presidency is just one piece of that puzzle.
And Greg,
As a history major, do yourself a favor and review the biography of Abraham Lincoln. I’m sure you’ll find some interesting parallels between the political experience of Lincoln and the political experience of Obama.
I’m not saying Obama is definitely going to be a Lincoln - only time will tell. All I’m saying is that they both entered the last leg of the presidential race with less than a decade of political experience. And we all know how Lincoln turned out.
August 30th, 2008 at 11:51 pm
#1 At the bottom of this post there is an AdSense banner telling everyone to join Team McCain.
#2 Obama is a great and intelligent speaker as he proved with his nomination speech. He does an amazing jop at selling his agenda. So what!…so does a good car salesman.
#3 Andrew, with all due respect, I think Obama has a lot of people brainwashed. In all honesty, I’m waiting for him to break out the Kool-Aid?
#4 Biden? Come on…Biden? This was a far worse choice than giving Kerry the nod in 2004, and it will be their downfall. If this “messiah” and so-called “US savior” is so intelligent, then how could he have chosen Biden?
August 31st, 2008 at 2:44 am
Andrew - I have been reading biographies of Lincoln since I could read.
Lincoln was a tremendous debater. He is known for his debates with Senator Stephen Douglas. Obama has backed down repeatedly from having live debates with McCain just as he did with Clinton.
Lincoln was a farming hick that did not have a formal education. He not only taught himself the 3 R’s, but also taught himself law. Obama’s progression was as follows: Occidental College in LA - Columbia University (BA) - community organizer for inner city Chicago (a church based community project; Jeremiah Wright anyone?) - Harvard (J.D. magna cum laude).
Lincoln served time in the military as a Captain in the Illinois militia. Obama has served zero time in the military.
Lincoln served for years in the House of Reps and as a lawyer before eventually becoming the Senator in 1858. Lincoln debated and bested the most powerful man (Douglas) in the Senate to win the election. Obama got elected Senator by default. The Democrats other candidates dropped out and the leading Republican candidate dropped out 3 months before the election.
Both Lincoln and Obama were lawyers from Chicago. Ok. Both Lincoln and Obama were heavily involved in the local area in regards to serving in the House of Reps. Ok. Both Lincoln and Obama were elected Senator of Illinois. Ok. Both ran for President before they got through one term in the Senate. Ok.
I think the difference outweigh the parallels. Lincoln had a civil war break out under his term. Now if Obama facilitates the same result - now that would be an interesting parallel.
August 31st, 2008 at 9:08 am
Given the apparent tension just on this site with typically level-headed, intelligent individuals, I would say civil war may not be too far off the mark…
In case none of you realized, the president is the commander in chief and ultimately controls the $2.7 trillion budget of our country. None of these candidates have any experience in dealing with these issues.
McCain’s time in a POW camp hardly counts as high-military strategy. Since he effectively was one of the dumbest people in his class at the Naval Academy, I doubt he is spectacular in the arts of war. Onto budget control - he has zero experience that could lead you to believe he has any idea what to do with an economy, budget, or foreign trade.
Obama is even worse. He has zero military experience so if he intends on taking military action I hope it is with the guidance of many seasoned pentagon and foreign relations committee members. Don’t even get me started on money - he will spend and spend and eventually go back on his promise to level the tax-field for the middle-class once he realizes that it takes money to spend money.
Comparing any of these clowns to Lincoln is folly, regardless of demographic coincidences.
August 31st, 2008 at 9:10 am
Oh, and it’s not like we control the Adsense ads…they do what they want.
August 31st, 2008 at 10:17 am
Jon,
Kool-aid. Thats pretty funny.
As for Biden…he’s got foreign relations experience, and Obama severely needs that. Yeah the guy talks way too much and often regrets what he says, but if he can control himself he’ll be an asset.
Everyone,
We should all acknowledge that Jay is right that none of these candidates are anywhere near 100% prepared to deal with the multiple challenges awaiting them.
But in my opinion the only time a person can be even close to 100% prepared for the challenges of a presidency are when they run for reelection. Thats it.
I’m voting for Obama because for whatever reason this guy has one hell of an ability to inspire people to work together. Yeah maybe thats why he should stick to being a community organizer, but maybe thats exactly what the US needs to overcome its current alienation from so many past allies.
August 31st, 2008 at 2:12 pm
How do you not have control of AdSense ads? You can custom pick them using the pro setup!
Yeah thats right…Kool-Aid..lol. This debate is all talk until November 4. On that day, our country will decide what we need. None of us can individually decide that.
September 6th, 2008 at 11:46 am
Here’s Obama being interviewed by Bill O’Reilly about the war on terror, our military efforts, and what to do about Iran.
September 6th, 2008 at 4:09 pm
That was a great clip. I look forward to Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday nights. If Obama can thwart even the “Great” Bill O’Reilly, then kudos to him.
Best quote from this clip on Iraq from Obama:
“We have reduced the violence, but the Iraqis still haven’t taken responsibility”
September 6th, 2008 at 10:28 pm
I liked that one too Greg.
Andrew great point about not being totally prepared for the presidency unless you have done it already. All of these candidates in some capacity will be learning on the job just as every president to date.
Greg, as far debates go is there any doubt that Sen. Obama will have a successful debate against Sen. McCain?
September 7th, 2008 at 11:02 am
I tell you what Keeks. I think Obama is a sensational speaker and knows how to definitely inspire with words (whether empty or not). In a debate, he should kick the crap out of McCain, but you never know. So until I see the debate(s), I will say there is always doubt. “You can’t count your chickens before your eggs hatch.”
This interview with O’Reilly was the 1st time I have ever seen Obama not look as prepared for some of the questions. It was not a speech, he did not have a teleprompter, and he still did a good job. He sure wasn’t as eloquent as he usually seems (he stuttered a little and had to slow down and think before he spoke - after all it is Bill O’Reilly), but hey that shows me, the average voter, a lot more character than just going up on stage and making beautifully prepared orations. That is the kind of spirit that depicts what that person’s character and spirit are really like. Being caught offguard with O’Reilly’s stubborn-like questions and still coming out of it unscathed, says a lot. You can’t be on your game every day and when you are not, how will you perform. I look forward to the other 3 interviews this week.
September 7th, 2008 at 12:45 pm
Yeah, I think Obama was smart to take O’Reilly up on his interview offer. No matter what you think of O’Reilly, you got to admit that he’ll test your bullshit on camera for all of his viewers to see.
It’s kind of like a gauntlet that the candidates need to get through to make it to the presidency. Way more spontaneous and real than a prepared speech.
September 7th, 2008 at 1:46 pm
It was a nice political move in attempt to steal the thunder from the RNC just as McCain did by announcing his VP the week of the DNC. A beautiful practice of political science on both sides.
September 7th, 2008 at 5:12 pm
Firstly, O’Reilly impressed me. He showed more restraint and respect for Obama than I expected.
Obama’s ability, in this first interview piece, to bob and weave amongst O’Reilly’s questions and still get his message across was a better picture of his ability to think under pressure. It still hasn’t brought me into his camp.
What I found most impressive was the depth of his understanding in regards to the War on Terror and the enemy we face. He demonstrated clear knowledge of the variety of enemies at hand, that they are different and sometimes belong to and span across multiple nations.
September 7th, 2008 at 10:13 pm
I’ll be posting parts 2-4 later in the week for anyone who misses it on TV.
September 8th, 2008 at 8:54 am
Andrew, are you going to continue posting them in this comment thread? Or are you going to make a separate post of all four parts when the interviews are complete?
September 8th, 2008 at 10:28 am
Rumor has it that Obama wants part 2 of the interview pulled because it talks about energy and economy.
This morning, Obama said he might keep the Bush tax cuts in place if the US heads towards a recession.
With the new gallup poll showing a significant bounce (McCain Palin 48%, Obama Biden 45%), I can see why he would want to hit the brakes and re-phrase a few things.
September 8th, 2008 at 11:08 am
There’s always more to polling than meets the eyes…
I remember back in mid-August McCain finally got a significant lead ahead of Obama. But what else happened mid-August? The Olympics! There was also no televised primary debates, and very little political news at that time. As soon as the Democratic Convention began it’s televised run Obama’s numbers shot ahead of McCain’s once again.
To me it just seems that whenever Obama’s name and face is plastered across the media, he jumps ahead of McCain. And, kudos to McCain’s campaign for realizing this fact about American voters. After all, they’ve successfully used Sarah Palin in such a way that she has now been plastered across the media for two weeks. So is it any surprise that McCain is ahead in the polls?
Feed an American the same image for enough time and they’ll be discussing it for days at the watercooler and the dinner table. Need I mention Michael Phelps? Maybe he should run for president…
September 8th, 2008 at 8:15 pm
He’s got enough bling to get my vote.