Tue 13 May 2008
Most people know who George Washington was and what he accomplished, such as being the 1st President of the United States. Most people also know that he was the Commander-in-Chief of the Continental Army during the Revolutionary War. I’m sure you’ve even heard the tale of chopping down his fathers cherry tree. Although he is known for all of these things, he has never been someone I thought was that great of a President. Until recently . . .
The Legacy of Cinncinnatus
Lucius Quinctius Cinncinnatus lived in the early days of the Roman Republic before there was such a thing as a dictator or emperor singlehandedly ruling. He served as a consul to Rome when the Senate and People of Rome (SPQR) ruled the streets. Before the Caesars and Augustus’ took a hold of Rome, the patricians and plebeians (mobs) were the ruling force and Rome was truly a Republic for the people governed by the Senate. Moving on, Cinncinnatus served as a consul in 460 BC where he was heavily involved in the politics of the day and relentlessly resisted plebeian proposed laws. After serving one year as a consul, he retired from politics and went back to his farm life.
However, the early years of Rome were filled with much violence as wars were a commonplace in the outlying regions around the Tiber River. Rome was at war with the local tribe, the Aequians, and after a major defeat against them at the Alban Hills, the Senate made the decision to appoint a dictator to lead the fledgling Republic to a victory. They appointed Cinncinnatus as dictator of Rome in 459 BC, pulling him out of retired farm life and asked him to lead their armies to defeat the Aequi. Cinncinnatus engineered a double pronged attack, utilizing his infantry and cavalry. Taken aback, the Aequi were defeated and surrendered to Cinncinnatus. After the war was won, Cinncinnatus disbanded his army and resigned as dictator, when he easily could have stayed on as the sole ruling power. Cinncinnatus was appointed dictator once more in 439 BC to put down a plebeian revolt, and once again resigned as dictator. He provides a great legacy in that he realized that the Roman Republic was not meant to be built upon the shoulders of emperors, dictators, or tyrants. He very well could have stayed on as dictator and appointed himself the emperor with the strength of his army and popularity, but he did not.
The Legacy of George Washington
Fast forward to 1776, the Revolutionary War, when the Continental Congress, headed by John Hancock, appointed General George Washington as Commander-in-Chief over the Continental Army. Due to George Washington’s rising popularity with his victories over the Red Coats, he won the respect and admiration of the 13 colonies and was elected as the United States first President, a title he held with much hesitation.
After serving two 4 year terms as President of the United States, George Washington gave up his elected seat and retired to quiet life in Mount Vernon. He very easily could have stayed in the White House as the Commander-in-Chief of the fledgling nation, but he knew that doing so would be counterproductive to the free nation that they had just fought for and won. To me this is the greatest legacy that George Washington left behind, as he could have very easily been the first king or emperor of the U.S. However he opted out of the office, such as Cinncinnatus did, and retired to quiet life. After Washington set the precedent of a two term limit on the presidency, no president broke that precedent until Franklin D. Roosevelt. After Roosevelt’s death, the 22nd Amendment was added to the U.S. Constitution that set the traditional 2 term limit to the President’s seat.
Popularity: 12% [?]
May 13th, 2008 at 4:59 pm
What do you want to bet that within our life time the 22nd amendment disappears?
May 13th, 2008 at 6:24 pm
It would be interesting to see that happen, perhaps that act alone would seal the U.S.’s fate and leave the same remains of the once great Roman Republic. History does have a habit of repeating itself. I think that if this were to happen then their would be a mass exodus towards Canada and Arnold Schwarzenegger would have to perform a coup d’etat to bring back our government.
May 13th, 2008 at 6:32 pm
Whose to say they don’t make another change just so he can run.
May 13th, 2008 at 8:57 pm
Ah yes, the law that you refer to is under Article 2 of the U.S. Constitution. Stating that only “a natural born citizen” could be eligible for the U.S. presidency. I could see a new law being enacted allowing Arnold to run for president in our life times, and I think he might even get elected (after all he is connected with the Kennedy’s and he is the “Governator”).
The beautiful thing about the U.S. Constitution is that we can amend laws for the relevancy of the current situation at hand.
May 13th, 2008 at 9:01 pm
That really depends on who is doing the amending.
May 13th, 2008 at 9:38 pm
Nice comparison. We’re lucky that our first president was as thoughtful as he seems to have been? Was this definitely his decision, or was he persuaded by his peers?
May 13th, 2008 at 9:53 pm
It was definitely Washington’s decision. Washington was seemingly unhappy as President and after the two 4 year terms passed it was his choice to leave due his dislike of the office. I can’t say that I blame him, Mt. Vernon was a lot quieter and relaxing than Philly. After he refused to run for a third term, he set the precedent for the next president to do the same.
May 13th, 2008 at 9:55 pm
Definitely his decision. His peers wanted him to stay on as many thought he was the only one capable of preserving the Union. Alexander Hamilton, his Secretary of the Treasury, and founder of the Federal Bank, wanted Washington to rule for life. Hamilton fancied dynastic conquest for America.
On the flip side, even Jefferson and Madison, who favored no central government, strongly supported the rule of Washington. Andrew, you must understand that there has never been an American who has been so revered. While he was living, Washington was viewed with awe as the closest thing to a real superhero that this country has ever seen.
He was humble, astute, and a natural leader. He was the only person who all the other founding fathers listened to and defaulted. He was also the only president to be unanimously elected. Washington felt he should not set an example of lifelong rule as an administrator, and that earned him the nickname as the American Cincinnatus.
May 13th, 2008 at 10:00 pm
Is it just me, or does this entire generation sound like they adhered to higher principles than we do now? Maybe I’m just falling for the American mythos. After all human nature is human nature, things don’t change that much.
May 13th, 2008 at 10:08 pm
The more I read about our American history the more amazing it all seems. But keep in mind it was a perfect storm of apparent fate; the enlightenment was cresting, colonial imports were booming, unfair taxes were being levied, and troops were occupying a prominent port city (Boston) causing much tension.
Powerful and intelligent people were being subjugated and they wanted to flex their muscle on the world’s stage. Britain had grown fat on the success of the colonies but continued to treat them only as second class citizens. Washington, for example, had his beef with the British escalate because they refused to promote him militarily in the same way they would native Britons.
British traders were racking up inaccurate debts with the prominent Americans they were trading with and this also pissed off the growing middle class.
During our Revolution, our merchant class was smart, powerful, and motivated. More importantly, they were on a whole a moral lot with strong convictions that they were doing God’s work on History’s biggest stage.
May 13th, 2008 at 10:12 pm
It must have been a very intense and exciting time to be an American. Or I guess an ex-Englishman.
May 13th, 2008 at 10:14 pm
~Benjamin Franklin
May 13th, 2008 at 10:32 pm
Great quote. Our founding fathers were truly rebels and Renaissance men.
May 13th, 2008 at 10:37 pm
I would not agree that they were all renaissance men.