Sun 23 Mar 2008
I am certainly not alone in thinking that the past decade has seen a heightened sense of awareness around whether your fellow Americans are political conservatives or liberals. There are entire “news networks” (it pains me to even call them that, the label alone lends some credence to organizations that I wish had none) dedicated to only one political spin on the news. Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, The New York Times, the list goes on and on of news networks that no longer will report the news at face value, but instead force upon their audiences stories discolored by the generic bias that particular network embodies.In the media you hear about “the liberals” and “the conservatives” as though they were analogous to the Civil War era “North” and “South”. One would be led to believe that these two groups of people are radical political activists who thirst for each other’s blood. The question I pose is: Is the political divide between conservatives and liberals actual or perceived?
The answer (from my personal observation and no other expert opinion at all): it depends on whether or not you strongly identify yourself with one of these two groups. If you strongly associate yourself with either being a liberal or a conservative, then this divide is more than likely very real to you; and you are, in fact, fighting a “politcal war” against the opposing ideology. Should you be an individual that does not necessarily associate yourself with either ideology with any real gusto or spirit, but may share opinions or views similarly to either group, then the divide may not be real to you.For those individuals who do strongly subscribe to one ideology or the other, then the divide is very real and very important.
It is important at all costs to do the following to those people who “belong” to the opposing camp:
- Tell everyone you know that (insert “Conservatives” or “Liberals” here, depending on which group you DO NOT belong to) are evil and will precipitate the demise of this great nation
- Use gross generalizations and misperceptions to describe the most basic characteristics of the opposing view while ensuring that they are cast in the least flattering light possible (this is a fine art form only seasoned fanatics can achieve with any cohesion)
- Never allow yourself to slip and actually research and ponder the opposition’s stance on an issue lest you be led astray from your brainwashing
- Espouse your unwavering support for all things, places and people that are (insert your affiliation of “Conservative” or “Liberal” here)
- Never deviate the from the views personified by the label under which you categorize yourself no matter how illogical, impractical or unintelligent those views may be, or else how could you ever obtain any street credit from your peeps?
The divide that exists in the schizo-paranoid minds of political radicals who allow their senses of logic, duty and patriotism to be over ridden by dogmatic views of a political ideology are a cancer to the principles of free will and thought upon which this country was founded. The moment you allow a personified political party to dictate your opinions and actions, you have done your country a great disservice. Perhaps a greater understanding of the opposing view point would, at the very least, promote a deeper knowledge and a more eloquent rebuttal to their positions rather than falling back on name-calling derived from the individual’s perceived political affiliation.
Yes, this was a rant-based blog based on the frustrations of being inundated with Conservative and Liberal bashing alike, by people who seem normal at first glance. One thing is for sure, if you hear (or are) a person who walks around talking about how either Conservatives or Liberals are the problem with this country, or something of the like, you should promptly place a mirror in this person’s face and kindly state, “Actually, what you see here is the problem.” Then smugly walk away, confident in the fact that the less evolved brethren you just had this little chat with will never quite grasp the underlying irony, but will probably ponder it for at least the amount of time they spend at a traffic light.
Popularity: 19% [?]
March 23rd, 2008 at 11:02 am
Some traffic lights are longer than others.
Excellent post (Anne Coulter is running to the hills or Rush Limbaugh’s bedroom), and award yourself 10 points for the use of Espouse.
March 23rd, 2008 at 3:01 pm
Traffic lights in PA are exceptionally long due to rampant use of the infamous protected left turn.
March 23rd, 2008 at 6:08 pm
It is pitiful that the news has such an impact on semi-intelligent people causing them to waver right or left. And thusly, making them drones.
March 23rd, 2008 at 7:28 pm
You are obviously an independent, and independents are evil and will precipitate the demise of this great nation.
But seriously, awesome post.
Some problems require a conservative answer and some a liberal. Your post is dead on about people needing to be open to the possibility of either interpretation.
There’s nothing more ironic than a machine on autopilot arguing for democracy and freedom.
March 26th, 2008 at 7:22 pm
Did you just call Dubbya a machine? Because I’ve been wondering if he was an android sent back from the future to kill Iraqis.
You know, in the year 2056 there is this raging war in which a chosen one from Iraq brings about the downfall of the evil Oceanic Empire (commonly known today as Western Europe, North America and Australia).
March 27th, 2008 at 8:58 am
Maybe Future Trunks will be sent to protect us DBZ style.
March 27th, 2008 at 5:41 pm
If the American presidency were a concert, then George Washington would be the opening act, George “X” would be the closing act, and George W. Bush would be the comic relief in between acts.
March 29th, 2008 at 3:37 pm
Those who refuse to take a stand one way or the other should be glad there are two opposing sides. Imagine how things would be if there were no opposition?
March 29th, 2008 at 5:11 pm
See, it is flawed logic such as that, Mr. Gundabar, that is precisely the problem I am trying to address. Thank you for providing an example.
Allow your mind to consider for a moment that it is not about choosing only one of two “sides”, but rather about what is the best course of action given the circumstances. As Andrew put very well, “Some problems require a conservative answer and some a liberal.” Additionally, not all problems have only a conservative or a liberal stance.
I am liberal in my conservatism and conservative in my liberalism.
March 29th, 2008 at 8:36 pm
What is it with people that are 40 and above that truly believe that there can only be 1 of 2 choices? Why can’t this country just do what right regardless of party affiliation? I just had dinner with my family and unfortunately we talked about politics. I find myself extremely frustrated and dumbfounded when talking to people that I used to hold in such high esteem. The 2 party system should be abolished, it is wrong and unproductive. George Washington was the 1st to say it.
March 30th, 2008 at 2:32 am
……In 2001, McCain founded the Alexandria, Va.-based Reform Institute as a vehicle to receive funding from George Soros’ Open Society Institute and Teresa Heinz Kerry’s Tides Foundation and several other prominent non-profit organizations.
Arianna Huffington, syndicated columnist and creator of the HuffingtonPost.com, has served on the Reform Institute’s advisory committee since the group’s inception.
McCain used the institute to promote his political agenda and provide compensation to key campaign operatives between elections.
In 2006, the Arizona senator was forced to sever his formal ties with the Reform Institute after a controversial $200,000 contribution from Cablevision came to light. McCain solicited the donation for the Reform Institute using his membership on the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. In a letter to the Federal Communications Commission, he supported Cablevision’s push to introduce the more profitable al la carte pricing, rather than packages of TV programming.
The July 6, 2001, homepage of the Reform Institute archived on the Internet lists founder McCain as chairman of the group’s advisory committee………….
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=56177
March 30th, 2008 at 6:42 am
What say you of the great divide between the left cheek and the right?
March 30th, 2008 at 11:34 am
That paints a terrible metaphorical picture of the moderate path. I’m speechless.
March 30th, 2008 at 12:01 pm
I agree with Will, the world needs opposition and constant disagreement.
If we try to find harmony between differing points of view we might actually end up with something that resembles peace, and who the hell would want that.