Fri 22 Feb 2008
The Jews Fought Hard for Israel
Posted by Gregory Rineberg under Babeled, History, International
A couple of days ago, Oren Gulasa babeled about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict from which an interesting discussion followed suit. Although the question of who is right and wrong in that region will never be resolved, as both the Arab side has reason for its gripes as does the Jewish side. Both sides were promised the same thing: Israel. While I empathize with the Arab side for being deceived by the British and losing their ‘covetous’ Israel, the Jews were the ones to form an elite unit of armed forces and establish the State of Israel. If it weren’t for the efforts of the Haganah, more specifically the Palmach and the Irgun, then Israel would not be the Jewish State it is today.
The Balfour Declaration
Upon the restructuring of the defeated Ottoman Empire following WWI, the British Cabinet supported establishing a Jewish state within the Palestinian borders. This pro-Zionist sentiment was portrayed in a letter from the British Foreign Secretary, James Balfour, to Lord Rothschild, an active Zionist Briton.
His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine, or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.
Clearly there were politicians in Britain, who were fervent Zionists and believed that the Jewish people should have a home inside British-Palestine. However, the British government employed the Arabs during the 1st World War to revolt against the Ottoman Empire and in return the Arabs were promised to have an independent Arab state. Well, as per the Balfour Declaration, the Jews were to go to Palestine as long as there was no ‘prejudice’ done to the existing communities, the Arabs. But, what if violence was to occur regardless of good intentions? Unfortunately, Britain promised both entities the same thing and were unprepared to facilitate peace in that region.
Brief History on the Arab-Israeli Conflict
The Arab-Israeli conflict is not a recent development; these two people have fought against each other over Palestine since 638 AD, when it was conquered by Caliph Umar. Judea was renamed Palestine when it was first conquered by the Romans in 61 B.C. and has changed hands between the the Jews, Christians, and Muslims since. More recently, in 1517, Palestine officially became a part of the Ottoman Empire, when the land was won from the Mamelukes of Egypt. Palestine was intermittently exchanged amongst the Arab world, between Egypt and the Ottoman Empire, as well as surrounding Arab states. Palestine would remain under Muslim influence (through Egyptian and Syrian culture) until WWI, when it was broken up by the League of Nations and ultimately given to Great Britain to deal with. At this same time, a major Zionist movement took hold over diplomacy in Great Britain through the Balfour Declaration and the Western world wanted to provide a home for the Jews. Over the next 30 or so years, Britain lost more and more control over the area with Arab rioting and violence. Matters only worsened after WWII when the the United Nations created General Assembly Resolution 181 declaring Palestine be partitioned into Arab and Jewish states.
The Haganah
During the 1920s and 1930s there were numerous Arab riots occurring within Israel. Several cities in Israel were laid waste to, including Jerusalem and Jaffa. On April 4, 1920, the Palestinians rioted in the Jewish Quarter of Jerusalem destroying and burning anything in their path. A year later, on May 1, 1921, there was yet another riot, dubbed the “Jaffa riots”, where the Jews suffered 48 deaths and the Arabs lost 45. The British presence in this region was ineffective in facilitating some semblance of peace and the Jews had to protect themselves from this violence and destruction. The Haganah, a group of Jews that were regulated to protect their livelihood (farms) from these Arab gangs, was commissioned by Jewish leaders. From the 1920’s through the 1930’s, the Haganah took on a much larger role in defending the Jewish communities against the Arab threat; ultimately helping to establish Israel as a Jewish state.
The Palmach and Irgun
The Palmach was a branch of the Haganah that trained with British forces during WWII to protect Palestine from the Nazi threat. The goal was to train every soldier to be a field commander and thus the Palmach became the ’special forces’ for Israel’s first army, the Haganah. Their creation aided in preventing a Syria-Lebanon invasion and following the Allied victory over the Syrians in North Africa, the Palmach was to be quickly dismantled. However, the whole organization went underground and unofficially declared war on Britain.
Over the next few years (1943 - 1945), the Palmach destroyed the British infrastructure, such as railways, bridges, and places of government. Much like the Spartans were the elite soldier of the Greek army, the same is the case for the Palmach to the Haganah. During the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, the Palmach held off the Arab invasion for just a long enough time for the Haganah and Jewish population to mobilize for war. Following the establishment of Israel as a Jewish state in 1948, the Palmach was dissolved into the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF), where they were crafted into two elite forces.
The Irgun was an offshoot radical group from the Haganah and took a much more ‘terroristic’ approach to defending and fighting for Israel. Just as the Palmach did, the Irgun launched guerrilla warfare on the British and Palestinians throughout Israel.
Defensiveness by way of offensiveness, in order to deprive the enemy the option of attacking, is called active defense.
With the notion that the best defense is the best offense, the Irgun quickly established themselves as the ‘radical’ Jews that would blow up café shops and kill Arabs to avenge Jewish deaths. They supported Hammurabi’s Code thusly extracting their “eye for an eye” vengeance. Nonetheless, the Palmach and the Irgun were instrumental in scaring the British away from this region.
The Arab-Israeli War
In 1948, Britain handed over Israeli mess to the United Nations. The United Nations decided in Resolution 181 that the former Mandate of Palestine be split with the Jews getting 56% of the land. Although the resolution was passed, it was not met with acceptance by the Arab countries and the violence only continued. On May 15, 1948, one day after the Declaration of Independence was signed, Syria and Egypt, along with other Arab countries, launched a major offensive (The Arab-Israeli War) against the newly appointed Jewish state. The Palmach and Irgun, as well the Haganah, fought and protected Israel in the Arab-Israeli War. The IDF, or the Israeli Armed Forces, won a Jewish state in Israel and has kept it that way for the past 60 years.
Conclusion
While I do empathize with Arab cause, I think that the Jewish people deserve to have Israel. I am not saying this because “I think that they were first ones to inhabit that region” or that they are religiously tied to it anymore than the Arabs or Christians, instead it is because they fought hard and won the land. Even when violence broke out and the British were powerless, the Palmach and Irgun were the groups that maintained some semblance of law and morality. Just as the Arabs helped Britain in WWI, the Jews helped Britain in WWII by disconnecting North Africa from the Axis of Evil. The Jews do not ideologically own Israel or Jerusalem anymore than the Arabs or the Christians, but the Jews have fought for their stake in Israel and continue to defend her borders today.
If nothing else, the Jews fought tooth and nail to have a sovereign state and succeeded in doing so.
Popularity: 70% [?]
33 Responses to “ The Jews Fought Hard for Israel ”
Comments:
Leave a Reply
Trackbacks & Pingbacks:
-
Pingback from arab israel conflict
June 2nd, 2008 at 9:48 pm[...] Conflict, the history behind it, and the army that established israel as a Jewish State.http://www.babeled.com/2008/02/22/the-jews-fought-hard-for-israel/Arab-Israeli conflict - Role of religionBrief overview of the role Islamic religion, and pan-Arab [...]
February 22nd, 2008 at 7:38 pm
Nicely done. When you put it that way, I understand. I just wanted someone to acknowledge the fact that it isn’t ridiculous or even slightly hard to believe that they would react the same way the Arabs have given the circumstances.
February 22nd, 2008 at 11:02 pm
Great job Mr. Rineberg.
I admit that I do have a problem with Palestinian nationalism spirit when do have 22 states in the region and keep rejecting any offer for peace.
Onr more issue, while history play major role, we should not forget that Religous is a spice in this dispute. Suprisingly, both religions’ holly books commend all of us to live together, with peace. Maybe it a topic for new article…
February 23rd, 2008 at 11:00 am
In their struggle the Haganah used a unique form of self-defense known as Krav Maga.
Here’s a video of Krav Maga urban training.
February 23rd, 2008 at 11:29 am
Andrew, that fighting technique was demonstrated on Fight Quest last night on the Discovery Channel.
February 23rd, 2008 at 11:43 am
A little Did You Know:
Yitzhak Rabin, Nobel Peace Prize winner for his peace efforts as the Prime Minister, was the Chief Operations Officer for the Palmach and became the Chief of Staff for the IDF.
February 24th, 2008 at 8:37 am
Oren - I’m pretty sure the Qur’an actually promotes spreading the religion at any cost, including violence. That isn’t the language of living together in peace, my friend.
What if, in 20 years when the Iraq conflict has blown up and the dust begins to settle, and the answer to peace is the U.S. needs to relocate Kurds from Northern Iraq to their own sovereign state, and they get the UN to pass a resolution ordaining sections of northeast Turkey and northwest Iran are to be made into a Kurdish nation. Do you think that the Iranians and the Turks would not immediately go to war against the new Kurdish country? And that land doesn’t even include Jerusalem…
February 24th, 2008 at 6:19 pm
The British mandate of Palestine was to be divided into two parts, the Arab Trans-Jordan and the Jewish Palestine. Some how this was lost in your article.
February 24th, 2008 at 6:42 pm
Thanks for the add-on Jeff. I should have inserted that point in there, it definitely would have made my post more complete. However, the point of the post was to show how the Jewish Israeli’s fought and earned their independence, which the San Remo Resolution had promised 30 before.
And yet where were the provisions and diplomacy in establishing that? Great Britain couldn’t handle the responsibility of fulfilling the San Remo Resolution or the Balfour Declaration. And with the impending onslaught of Arabs in the area (Jordan, Syria, Egypt), regardless of what the Mandate stated, the Jewish Israelis had to fight and fight they did.
‘To the Victor Goes the Spoils’
February 27th, 2008 at 7:39 pm
Greg:
No sense in empathizing with the Arabs. Until they stop allowing their true oppressors to rule, they will always be poor and hapless. The existence of Isreal serves as a diversionary target for those Arabs who profit from oil while letting their people live like crap!
oBy the way, other than oil (which, coincidentally is extruded from the ground by western companies) try to think of one thing (not terrorism) that the arab world produces for the rest of the world.
February 27th, 2008 at 7:44 pm
Islam is the Arab gift to the world, just ask your local friendly Mullah.
February 27th, 2008 at 7:44 pm
How about … wait, no … or maybe, no … I got it, and I lost it.
Seriously there is one thing; the Arab Muslims did preserve much of the ancient technologies of the Greeks and Romans.
March 1st, 2008 at 7:37 pm
Excellent article. Good Israel site here: http://www.lookisrael.com
March 1st, 2008 at 8:22 pm
Persian rugs?
March 2nd, 2008 at 7:36 pm
Noam Chomsky has some rather interesting things to say on this subject.
March 8th, 2008 at 9:54 pm
Please review the language you use to describe the sides of the conflict, then reflect on what it tells us about your prejudices.
Also, read a history book, you’ve only got half of the story there.
March 8th, 2008 at 11:15 pm
Zing-
Please reread the article and then if you wish make an insightful comment. Blanket statements don’t really get your point across.
“Please review the language you use to describe the sides of the conflict, then reflect on what it tells us about your prejudices.”
Language? I do believe that I used the english language, if this is something that you can’t comprehend then sorry, but thats not my fault.
As to your notion of prejudice, I am 100% confident that I never said that the Arabs didn’t deserve Israel, I simply said that the Jews moblized a force and won their independent state. Perhaps I am mistaken and you meant another prejudice?
Lastly, I have read many history books throughout my life, as it has been my favorite subject since 3rd grade. Oh, yeah and I did receive my B.A. in Classics.
March 9th, 2008 at 12:04 am
At least that wasn’t a defensive answer.
March 9th, 2008 at 9:40 am
Zing,
I believe if you gave some specific areas you disagreed with then we could have an intelligent exchange of ideas. However when you just say the blogger got it wrong and that he is prejudice then the debate becomes personal and thus fruitless.
March 10th, 2008 at 10:35 pm
Its a great article, but I don’t think anyone is arguing about Israel’s right to exist, not even the Arabs . They have long realized that Israel is there to stay. It is interesting that you bring up the Spartans because they to had a war-based economy. Active defense is a military technique and should not be adopted as a permanent socio-political policy that is ingrained into the national creed. Islam nor Judaism should be blamed; We should blame the bridge of tolerance that we should of built along with our technology. Its time for Israel to lend a helping hand and for the Palestinians to take it in gratitude. To create a Peace model as their contribution to the international community that they will be a part of.
March 11th, 2008 at 1:15 am
I absolutely agree Al. I would like nothing else than for there to be peace in the region.
March 16th, 2008 at 9:39 am
Actually, Al, you’re wrong. Most of the Arabs Do argue Israel’s right to exist. Many Palestinian organizations - including part of their government - call for the destruction of the State of Israel. Furthermore, many a time Israel’s ONLY demand for peace talks (other than stopping the enormous amount of rockets being launched) has been recognition of the country, which has been refused.
That said, I think most Palestinians (not the radicals and not the government necessarily) have come to terms with Israel existing, and most want peace with Israel. It would be even be beneficial - the Israelis have a robust economy with success in almost every field, not the least of which being hi-tech (#2 in the world only after the US). It’s a shame the Palestinians have been unable to elect a government that believe in the same things the citizens do.
March 16th, 2008 at 10:35 am
TalTalk-
Great points about Israel being the #2 hi tech capital of the world. The Israeli University, Technion, is one of the TOP technology schools in the world.
March 16th, 2008 at 10:44 am
Yes, I know. There was actually an article about it today in Fox Business. I blogged about it here: http://realisrael.wordpress.com/2008/03/16/israel-is-the-silicon-valley-of-the-mediterranean/.
Per capita, Israel is ahead of everyone. As far as listings on Nasdaq, Israel has 75, behind only the US and Canada, and ahead of even Germany and China.
March 16th, 2008 at 11:21 am
So with all this technological advancement going on in Israel, I’m guessing it won’t be too long before Mel Brooks’ prophecy comes true…
Jews In Space
March 18th, 2008 at 10:36 am
There are a great many Mel Brooks prophecies I am waiting to come to fruition.
March 18th, 2008 at 9:30 pm
Andrew, that was awesome.
March 18th, 2008 at 9:33 pm
Am I the only one who can hear cheesy used car salesman emphasis that undoubtedly would accompany ANY of the words Rineberg capitalizes in his comments?
March 18th, 2008 at 10:25 pm
Very true, it probably helps that we know him so well. And Andrew has been on fire lately.
April 21st, 2008 at 3:05 pm
I geuss you do have a point, most countries were created the same way. Americans fought and killed indigenous people for their land. It must be a world wide theme, “If you can move or kill your neighbor you can have their land.”
Only one other comment. If there is still fighting, then neither side has really “won” true ownership of the land. It seems to me the area is still up for grabs. It is sad to imagine how long people will die for either nations.
April 21st, 2008 at 5:16 pm
Thanks for stopping by Duane.
It is a real shame that the fighting over there will not end and both sides show no signs of showing any willingness to compromise. Israel has a long history of violence between covetous peoples and will continue to be so. When you gain something with violence, it seems only natural that violence takes it away.
April 21st, 2008 at 9:40 pm
There was an interesting article today on NYTimes about Jimmy Carter’s recent meetings with the Syrian government and Hamas.
April 21st, 2008 at 9:41 pm
I couldn’t edit the comment to put the link in so here it is:
http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/world/news-palestinians-israel-carter.html?ex=1224388800&en=5898233e61fc7bce&ei=5087&excamp=GGGNjimmycarter&WT.srch=1&WT.mc_ev=click&WT.mc_id=GN-S-E-GG-NA-S-jimmy_carter