Tue 19 Feb 2008
Breaking the Myths About the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict
Posted by Oren Gulasa under History, International
I was recently approached by colleagues from school who asked me to explain what is happening in my region. Shortly after I mention that I am from Israel, I usually get one of two questions (or both):
- Why do you guys kill each other?
- Do you speak Jewish?
In this short essay, however, I will try to answer the first question, and to identify the parties involved and their motivation for action (Which I found to be the major confusion).
Short History of the Jewish Settlement in Palestine
From 1000 BC to 636 AD, the land was routinely conquered by Assyrians, Babylonians, Persians, Greeks, Egyptians and Romans. According to historian Martin Gilbert, Jews formed the main settlement population for more than six hundred years. During this time, the Romans rename Judea as Palestine, and launched efforts to empty the area of Jews. In 637 AD, Jerusalem was conquered by Muslim Arabs who ruled in the area until 1099. The Christian Crusaders were the next to conquer Palestine. They persecuted and slaughtered the Jews of Palestine and remained in the area until 1291. The Mameluks (Muslim) overthrew the Crusaders in 1291 and offered the Jewish settlement a better life and a place of safety from the Christian persecution in Europe. The Mameluks ruled until 1517 and were replaced by the Ottoman Turks. Between 1880 and 1914 over sixty thousand Jews entered Palestine, mostly from Russia, Galicia, Romania and Poland. Palestine became a British colony in 1839 and remained under the British Foreign Authority until 1947. A year later, the State of Israel was founded after a vote was taken in the United Nations. Israel became the nation of the Jewish people to which any Jewish person has rights of citizenship. The young state was not (and is still not) recognized by the Arab World.
The Big Myth Which is Just Not True; The Palestinians Were Always in the Area
There has been a Jewish presence in Israel for the past 2000 years, while the Palestinians’ movement only began in 1964 with the establishment of the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO). The Palestinians originated from the Hisamic nationality originally from Jordan and Egypt. Until today, Jordan (The Hashemite Kingdom) has a majority of Hisamic Arabs. The Palestinians crossed the Jordan River toward Jerusalem and were never allowed back.
Some Arab Palestinians made it into Israel
Those people agreed to join the new state in 1948, and shortly after the Independence War, they received the rights of an equal citizen, including a passport and the right to vote. They are the Arab Israelis who built cities within Israel and have social, health and educational benefits provided by Israel. In fact, according to Dershowitz (2003):
The Arab citizens within Israel live a better life, as measured by income, health, longevity, and other accepted criteria- than the Arabs of any neighboring country.
No wonder why the majority of this population opposes the idea of including some of their cities in Palestinian state.
The Present Day
Israel has made a genuine effort to establish peace negotiations with its neighbors, as evidenced from the peace negotiations it has with both Egypt and Jordan. Poll after poll demonstrated that the people of Israel desired true peace with the Palestinians and are willing to make difficult compromises to achieve it. However, in recent years, these same polls demonstrate that Israelis believe that Palestinians are not interested in peace, given the ongoing terrorism, and the rocket attacks on the city of Sderot (Judith Heistein, the ADL.org).
Israel Has no Desire to Rule over Palestinian Land
Moreover, Israel wants to give Palestinians sovereignty. In an effort to do just that the Israelis disengaged from Gaza in 2005 and relocated 17,000 of its own people.
The Palestinians Never Sought Statehood When They Were Occupied by Jordan or Egypt
Historically, the Palestinians wanted to be part of Syria. This is also why Yasser Arafat founded the PLO in Southern Lebanon, a region in which he was in exile for so many years. Israel has stood ready - and stands ready to this today - to offer Palestinian statehood, in exchange for the Palestinian authority making genuine efforts to stop terrorism by Palestinian groups, such as Fatah and Hamas.
The Sad Conclusion
This condition is perfectly reasonable and justifiable condition that any democratic state that was faced with comparable dangers, would demand. Unfortunately, the Palestinian authority had long lost control over its own militants and it is a lot to ask for. Thus, we won’t see any progress in the near future.
Popularity: 22% [?]
14 Responses to “ Breaking the Myths About the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict ”
Comments:
Leave a Reply
Trackbacks & Pingbacks:
-
Pingback from The Jews Fought Hard for Israel » Babeled
February 22nd, 2008 at 7:23 pm[...] couple of days ago, Oren Gulasa babeled about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict from which an interesting discussion followed suit. Although the question of who is right and wrong [...]
February 19th, 2008 at 10:35 pm
Oren, you are absolutely right. Too many people confuse history and think the Palestinian’s were the first to settle the region. It is easily confused since people hear about ancient Palestine in their text books. Obviously those books are not referring to the land of Palestinian’s.
We can just blame the Romans for this too!
February 19th, 2008 at 11:45 pm
Excellent history of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict.
February 20th, 2008 at 9:36 am
Example of people lacking the right information:
This morning while listening to a talk radio program, a caller answered a trivia question by saying he thought Jewish people originated in the United States.
February 20th, 2008 at 4:30 pm
Wow, that qualifies as a dumb-ass of the day comment by that trivia guru.
OK, so I am now confused by all this violence. You’re information contains no apparent motive for the Palestinian violence towards Israel, yet you offer no “Palestinian Reason and why it’s…(insert unreasonable, unfounded, misconceived, or whatever adjective you like)”, so I am at a loss as to why there is conflict at all. Why do the Palestinians attack Israel?
February 20th, 2008 at 4:53 pm
To remedy my ignorance in this matter, I have spent some time reading up on related subjects. Here is what knowledge I have acquired that seems applicable to, if not necessarily in support of, this post:
1. The British have coerced various Arab peoples to unite against an enemy of Britain’s in return for the promise of British help in forming a United Arab Empire ruled from Mecca, and were twice betrayed.
2. The initial land of this fictitious United Arab Empire was to include the Arabian peninsula, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, Israel and Jordan.
3. In 1922 the population of Palestine consisted of approximately 589,200 Muslims, 83,800 Jews, 71,500 Christians and 7,600 others (1922 census [8]).
4. The British needed the Arabs help (the second time) in World War II and thus formed the Arab League, or League of Arab States.
5. After World War II, the United Nations approved the division of Palestine into two states despite the fact that the entire Arab League opposed the measure
6. The United States, Britain, and France then supplied Israel with weapons and defense systems along with substantial economic aid, all of which was then used to fight against Arabs in the 1948 Arab Israeli War, a conflict which resulted in the expansion of Israel outside of the boundries set forth by the United Nations.
Now, whether or not you subscribe to the “we-were-here-first-so-it-should-belong-to-us” sort of entitlement mentality, then yes Israel has been nothing but a friendly neighbor and Arab sanctuary from the quality of life stats. But if you choose to walk a mile in someone else’s shoes, whether you agree with them or not, sometimes leads you to understanding of why a group of people may not see eye to eye with you on that subject. Especially since, while the Jews may have been there before the Palestinians, at the time all of this really began at the time of World War I, there were 7 times as many Arabs living in the land than Jews. So, can you blame these people for being pissed off that they were betrayed by the British twice; who, instead of helping them like they promised, took away their land and gave it to the Jews, despite the fact that they did not approve of this “United Nations” measure (indeed), which was ultimately pushed through by the very people who offered to help them? Since their technological reach is limited, they fought against the target that was close by: Israel. I’m sorry, Oren, but I honestly can’t blame these people for standing up for themselves against tyrannical imperialists.
February 20th, 2008 at 6:37 pm
thanks Jason, good comments. The realty is that the Jews were substantial majority in those areas of Palestine partitioned by the United Nations for a Jewsih state.
Pepole sometimes mistakenbly include the population of whhat is now Jordan, as well as what is now Gaza and the West Bank in estimating the Arab population of that time. Aslo, the number you cam up with most probably contain Druz, Bediuns, Christians and others.
Most of the land originated to the Jeswsih state by the UN was a desert, that later was made fertile by the Jewsih settlement.
Most important, the Arab at this time were lack of national identity. If the Arab had accpeted the UN partition, there would have been large Palestinian state alongside a Jewish state. The two states solution, whats now is a concensus would be achieved without bloodshed. Instead, in 1947 and once again in 2000 (in Camp David talks) Arab nation’s leaders and Palestinian leaders reject the offer and chose the way of war to reach the vast land dream.
And all of this is without mentioning the steps we made to “nationize” the Palestinians problem as none of the Arab firendly state never did. In that sense, we recognize them as people.
February 20th, 2008 at 10:42 pm
Unfortunately this debate has never had a resolution to it and thats why there will always be conflict in the region. All parties involved are too stubborn to dissolve their beliefs and will to ensure a better life.
Make no mistake though that the Jewish Zionists in Israel fought hard to establish a Jewish State.
February 21st, 2008 at 11:54 am
Its unfortunate that Israel is such prime real estate for Western countries invested in Arab resources…
Until Israel eases its dependence on U.S. financial support (bribes), it will never be taken seriously by the Arab community. It is their association with Western countries that undermines every effort to achieve peaceful relations with their neighbors.
The fact is that the U.S. is continually fighting a war that it continually helps to maintain. It’s a vicious cycle all fueled by dependence on oil.
We pay for war.
February 21st, 2008 at 2:30 pm
Andrew, that completely oversimplifies the situation. Things are far more deep-seeded and less superficial than that.
February 21st, 2008 at 4:40 pm
I understand that the situation is ridiculously complex and that there are more factors than just Western financial support…I just can’t see how any major association with the US could help Israel establish peace with its Arab neighbors - especially considering the anti-American attitude resulting from the Iraqi war, the Afghan war, and the escalating Iranian situation.
February 21st, 2008 at 4:45 pm
I agree that our presence does not promote peace. But if we ceased support of Israel (financially and politically) we lose a strategic ally, and practically ensure mass chaos and war in the Middle East. Sure the region is a mess with us there, but the power vacuum left my a complete withdrawal and abandonment of Israel would be very ugly. At which point the blood would still be on our hands.
February 21st, 2008 at 5:28 pm
Oren - thanks for the response. The population estimate I quoted listed Christians separately, and there were almost as many Christians as Jews at the time I may point out, but the Druz and Bedoins may very well be included in the ‘Muslim’ category.
To address the “two-state partition” point you make: I agree, the Arabs lack of an identity was at the core of the matter. But the part you are choosing not to acknowledge is that a Western nation, Britain, OFFERED to assist them build an identity and betrayed the Arabs on this promise TWICE. And instead of giving the Arabs what was promised, they instead gave the land to the Jews.
Are you seriously going to say that you can’t understand why the Arabs are angry at Jews for having possession of land that was once theirs’ and was taken away from them by a country that promised to help them? I just can’t believe that a person can’t empathize with that at all, which the entire population of Israel and most of the Western world can’t seem to get their heads around.
February 21st, 2008 at 11:04 pm
Jason, I am very touched by your passion to the truth. Unfortantly, you are just not right about the Britian offer.
Please refer to Balfour Declaration from 1917. There were four options;
1. Give all the land to a new Arab state.
2. Give all land to the Jews
3. Turn all land to Syria
4. Divide the land fairly between the Arabs and the Jews so each could create a home-land based on Slef-Declaration.
Although option #4 was officiely chosen; The Arabs always refer to Palestine as part of Syria. They wanted it all and demand elmination of Jewsih presence from Palestine. They rejected the offer; twice.
As per the land we took in 1967, some of Israeli leaders already agreed to give it back. I personally think that it is a mistake; But if you grant me absolute Peace and normalizaion with all the Arab world, i would have to agree. Can you?