Fractal Universe

While contemplating my pathetically insignificant existence in contrast to the vastness of the universe, I came to a realization that may not be original or uncommon, but for me it was a blissful epiphany.

Fractals at the Atomic Level

Consider the structure of an atom: electrons “orbit” the nucleus. One could compare the electrons to planets orbiting a star (the nucleus). Atoms combine to form molecules, and molecules combine in ever-increasingly complex systems to create organic cells. Billions of star systems are contained within a galaxy, which is analogous to the cell in this situation. Cells then combine to form higher life forms, just as galaxies form clusters. Galaxy clusters represent the cosmic twin to the quantum life form. Galaxy clusters interact with one another, but only slightly, similarly to organisms interacting with one another in a community. The analogies are not perfect, but the similarities do exist.

Fractal Parallels Between the Birth of Star Systems and Flowers

Supernova

Another series of fractal similarities was brought to my attention upon learning of research done on the birth of the solar system. It is believed that a nearby Supernova released heavy metals such as silicon and iron into the gas cloud that was the material from which the Sun and the planets were created. The silicon and iron particles careened into the gas cloud and the increased matter caused the cloud to collapse on itself. The speed of the particles accelerated by gravity at the center of the cloud inexorably led to the ignition of the Sun.

This is similar to a system that operates on a much smaller scale here on Earth. Angiosperms (flowering plants) reproduce by way of a male releasing pollen (sperm) into the air that hopefully finds its way to the carpel which contains the ovules (egg). The two combine to form a fruit containing seeds, from which new plants are born. Supernova are the stamen which releases pollen (iron and silicon) and the gas cloud is the carpel. When the two combine, a new entity is born in the likeness of the components from which it was spawned.

Sunflowers In Pitcher HDR

Fractal Parallels Between the Cosmos and Animal Cells

It is also possible to see similarities between a eukaryotic cell and a galaxy. Supernova are the material factories of a galaxy. The extreme nuclear reactions that occur as a result of the enormous power from a supernova create the heavier elements of the universe, including organic and metallic atoms. Without Supernova, atoms much larger than Helium and Hydrogen would not exist. Eukaryote Cell DiagramCompare this with the ribosomes of the eukaryote cell. Ribosomes assemble proteins, which are the building blocks of many of the other structures that make up the cell. Without the ribosome, cells would not exist because the proteins necessary to create corollary cell structures such as flagellum, mitochondria and golgi body are made in the ribosomes. It is also postulated that there is a Super Black Hole at the center of the galaxy, thus fulfilling the role of a recycling plant. Other black holes exist at various points in the galaxy as well. Black Holes are like the lysosomes of a cell, whose function is to recycle toxins and old organelle materials.

Coincidence? Maybe. Providence? Perhaps. Logical? Most definitely. As Carl Sagan says, “We are all made of star stuff,” and he is quite right. Since everything in the universe has its roots in the same basic building blocks and adheres to the same laws of physics, it is no wonder that similarities exist between the many scales of existence. Ironic, all we really are is a way for the universe to observe itself.

Image used in this post

Sunflowers courtesy of Flickr user will_hybrid under the CC license.

Cross-Section of an Animal Cell. Enchanted Learning, Copyright 2001-2009.

This entry was posted in Science and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

About the Author

Jason Morgan
A corporate bean counter and desk jockey by day, an armchair philosopher and video game junky by night. For fear of marinating in his own filth for the remainder of his days, he took up corporate finance to make something of himself.

31 Comments

  1. Posted February 9, 2008 at 10:32 am | Permalink

    Great post, this is definitely a parallel I have spent much time thinking about. The symmetry is far to prevalent to just be coincidence. The architecture of our Universal machine is intelligent and well-crafted.

    Speaking our our little Solar System, The Helioshphere, it is believed by scientists that our Sun is a third or fourth generation star. This far along in the evolutionary process sends out the heavier elements as you mentioned in the post.

  2. Posted February 9, 2008 at 11:59 am | Permalink

    The stamen/supernova comparison is priceless, and an idea I never heard before.

    Once these patterns have been discovered, it becomes impossible to keep observing the universe as dead, blind, chaotic, material force. I’m not saying the conclusion is intelligent design, or that the universe somehow possesses conscious volition along human lines – but this certainly leaves me with the sense that the universe as a whole is far more ALIVE than we might like to think it to be.

    Our concept of “life” just doesn’t seem to match up with the reality of the situation.

  3. Posted February 9, 2008 at 12:35 pm | Permalink

    Well the Universe is chaotic, that is the great paradox.

  4. Posted February 9, 2008 at 2:10 pm | Permalink

    Just because something appears chaotic doesn’t necessarily mean that it is. I just have a hard time labeling the processes of physics as absolutely chaotic when they consistently produce ordered results. The mere fact that the universe produced the human mind seems to undermine the idea of a complete chaos. I really think its our concepts of “chaos” and “order” that make us think there’s a paradox. And if the universe was truly chaotic, wouldn’t we not be able to observe, on repeated occasions, the various physical laws we’ve discovered? The very fact that we can label these processes “laws” seems to undermine any chance of this being chaotic.

  5. Posted February 9, 2008 at 3:48 pm | Permalink

    Andrew – see the post regarding the Second Law of Thermodynamics. As time passes entropy increases. And entropy is basically another word for chaos.

  6. Posted February 9, 2008 at 3:52 pm | Permalink

    Also, the growing chaos is what drives further development of the Universe. Were it not for entropy, we would not be on this blog asking all of these questions.

  7. Posted February 9, 2008 at 7:23 pm | Permalink

    I guess what I was trying to say was that it seems to me that chaos shouldn’t produce any kind of fractal pattern – i mean wouldn’t it all be randomness? I guess the paradox is that chaos/entropy produces order and structures? Its all very fascinating, but I wish I was better versed in this stuff.

  8. Posted February 9, 2008 at 8:35 pm | Permalink

    The more chaos that occurs, the better chance for random developments in the Universe.

  9. Posted February 10, 2008 at 6:25 pm | Permalink

    Here’s an interesting quote and article about chaos and fractals:

    “Researchers discovered a simple set of three equations that graphed a fern. This started a new idea – perhaps DNA encodes not exactly where the leaves grow, but a formula that controls their distribution. DNA, even though it holds an amazing amount of data, could not hold all of the data necessary to determine where every cell of the human body goes. However, by using fractal formulas to control how the blood vessels branch out and the nerve fibers get created, DNA has more than enough information. It has even been speculated that the brain itself might be organized somehow according to the laws of chaos.”

  10. Posted February 11, 2008 at 6:05 pm | Permalink

    Ok, so, since chaos increases over time in a closed system leading to increasing diversity, and since chaos is characterized by self-similar fractals, and since the universe seems more than abundant in self-similarity….than am I to assume that the universe is a closed system, and that therefor its ENTIRE evolution from the big-bang has been nothing but a fractalization -which would mean that everything that exists is self-similar in some fundamental way?

    If this has already been answered in some book, please refer me.

  11. Posted February 11, 2008 at 7:59 pm | Permalink

    I cannot speak for every scientist, but I know Hawking believes our Universe is a closed system. This is why the second law of thermodynamics applies to our existence. A good starter read is Hawking’s A brief History of Time.

  12. Posted February 18, 2008 at 2:08 pm | Permalink

    One of the most original ideas I have seen in a while.

  13. Posted April 22, 2008 at 10:19 pm | Permalink

    Ok, this question is potentially dragging me down the rabbit hole…

    If for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction, then wouldn’t the universe HAVE to crunch back into its pre-bigbang state in a matter of time…and then eventually explode back out in another big bang, ad infinitum?

    If the above is true, or a possible truth, then, in light of comment #10, would the universe inevitably be an eternally recurring fractal, forever identical in its pattern and direction of evolution?

    Cause if there’s any truth to the above questions then I got three words for you:

    De ja vu.

  14. Posted April 23, 2008 at 10:05 am | Permalink

    Andrew there has been much debate over the expansion of the Universe and whether it would end in a big crunch (contracting back to a singularity) or just continue its accelerating expansion where stars burn out as the Universe cannibalizes the available matter.

    Richard Feynman with his Sum of Histories has done much work to examine the inflationary model of the Universe (where things started with a rapid expanding universe and then reduce there momentum but still maintain a course to continue expanding indefinitely). Many scientists buy into this line of thinking. But Feynman’s theory also is founded upon the principles that there are infinite outcomes for all particles and therefore infinite universes.

    His theory further details how universes would behave differently charted with imaginary numbers. This produces a universe that has no edge. In effect one would navigate in the same manner of sailing around the globe – you could travel east to go west and north to go south. Sadly my poor knowledge of mathematics leaves me a poor candidate to further and better explain this phenomena.

  15. Posted April 23, 2008 at 8:28 pm | Permalink

    There are some scientists who believe that the theoretical mass contained within the spacial dimensions of the universe is great enough to at some point produce a gravitational implosion, a.k.a the big crunch. This, however, requires the acceptance of the still-theoretical dark matter and dark energy phenomena.

    Your thinking is well-conceived on this topic. I recommend reading the Elegant Universe by Brian Greene. You will enjoy it, just don’t get discouraged because I find myself having to re-read certain passages to ensure best understanding of the subject matter.

  16. Posted April 23, 2008 at 10:25 pm | Permalink

    Cool, I’ll definitely pick that book up.

    I think the ultimate satisfaction comes from being able to find a harmony between philosophy and science.

    I’ve been entranced by Hindu philosophy for the last few years specifically because their insights into reality are so damn close to the discoveries of modern science.

    While the Abrahamic religions were getting violent over their belief that the world is 5,000 years old and that worship of multiple gods is idolatrous, the Hindu’s were relaxing with the knowledge that the universe lasts for billions of years and that multiple gods are just a symbol for the multiple beings that evolved from a unified energy.

    Its just crazy they came up with this stuff thousands and thousands of years ago.

  17. Posted April 23, 2008 at 10:52 pm | Permalink

    Don’t buy the book. I happen to possess an extra copy which I shall bestow upon you.

  18. Posted April 23, 2008 at 11:08 pm | Permalink

    Nice man! And my friend Jack just lent me Hawkings Brief History of Time today, so I think I’ll be coming out of the summer with a much better grip on how the physical universe operates.

  19. Posted April 24, 2008 at 3:41 pm | Permalink

    Indeed. That is a great book as well. A must read for those interested in this type of exploration.

  20. Posted April 24, 2008 at 3:58 pm | Permalink

    Andrew, I recently read that Hawking book as well. It is an excellent overview of how science has progressed and where science is going. I recommend following that one up with Hawking’s Universe in a Nutshell.

    If of course you found Hawking’s write enjoyable and useful.

  21. Posted April 24, 2008 at 6:11 pm | Permalink

    I started it today and I like it.

    My only problem with Hawking’s writing is that I find myself hearing his mechanical voice the entire time. Which isn’t too bad actually, cause it makes me feel like I’m in one of his lectures.

  22. Posted April 25, 2008 at 3:23 pm | Permalink

    I think hearing him talk is the best part. It reminds me of those little spelling and math computer learning devices that were all the rage when we were kids.

    3 is less than 7. Correct.

  23. Posted May 1, 2008 at 1:33 pm | Permalink

    I happened on your blog regarding the fractal universe and enjoyed both the article and the comments. The self similarities that make up fractals do indeed suggest a universal connectedness. I think the term chaos theory is a little unfortunate in that it intuitively induces a picture of utter disorder when in more practical terms it is just the inability to predict what is going to happen next. Here are links to a couple of my blog entries in this general area of ponderment. : )
    http://sezme.net/page40.html
    http://sezme.net/page58.html

    Jim

  24. Posted May 1, 2008 at 8:05 pm | Permalink

    Jim, thanks for stopping by. I checked out your site and you have some really great content over there. I plan on going back and reading many more of your articles.

    Is there any way to leave comments on your site?

  25. Posted May 2, 2008 at 8:32 am | Permalink

    Greg

    Thanks for the kind words. I am having a lot of fun with my site, especially since I no longer have to do the four letter W— word. I don’t have a comment function on my site mainly to avoid the haters and spamers, but maybe I should just get over that so I can benefit from input from bright folks. Jim

  26. Posted May 3, 2008 at 10:08 pm | Permalink

    Jim – excellent site. I just have to be careful because you’ve got enough subject matter on there that I am interested in where I could find myself realizing it’s 4:00 AM and my eyes are watering from looking at the laptop all night.

    The spam and haters are indeed irritating. Somehow, when you get a solid comment from an interesting/interested reader, it makes it all worth it.

  27. Jason D. Padgett
    Posted May 31, 2008 at 10:02 pm | Permalink

    Hi,

    My name is Jason D. Padgett. I’m a math/quantum physics student in Washington state. I’ve found how and where fractals arise including exactly why everything that exists are fractals. I can show you how to hand draw a fractal of literally anything. Since you love fractals you will LOVE this. Please email me at jasonquantum1@yahoo.com and I will send you hand drawn fractals like you’ve never seen before and I promise I’m not exaggerating. Or if you need to see proof first please go to fantastic fractals and click on the button that says “How to make a fractal”. This is a much better way to do fractals as it shows why and how everything is a fractal.

    Look forward to hearing from you.

    Sincerely,

    Jason D. Padgett
    email- jasonquantum1@yahoo.com

  28. Posted November 5, 2008 at 10:06 pm | Permalink

    Check out this interactive fractal…

  29. Posted March 19, 2009 at 2:33 pm | Permalink

    The HDR sunflower picture is outstanding. We need to Hubble to take some High Dynamic Range images of the Universe.

  30. Posted March 21, 2009 at 11:15 am | Permalink

    HDR Hubble photos? If that were possible, it would be awesome. On the Hubble’s Universe show on NatGeo (I think) they said that the colors you see in the Hubble pictures are actually rendered by a computer according to what element is present. I forget which colors corresponding to which atoms, and the show only gave a few examples, but I found that a pretty interesting fact. Something like red was hydrogen, and blue sulphur, or whatever. I always wondered how they made color pictures from x-ray images.

  31. pepe
    Posted March 21, 2009 at 12:10 pm | Permalink

    Analogies are easy to find if there is no need to map them point for every point.
    The other day I found an analogy between my belly button and a central galactic black hole.
    Tomorrow I must do better and see if I can find a cosmic analogy for my…

One Trackback

  1. By Sum Over Histories » Babeled on March 3, 2008 at 5:06 am

    [...] the natural selection of our universe, allowing it to flourish and understand itself? It is with an unfathomable complexity that single cell organisms were able to manifest from star stuff, let alone the chain of events [...]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

get Gravatared!

Want to see your mug next to your comments?
Sign up for your own Globally Recognized Avatar. It's easy, it's free, and we will show you how!

  • Subscribe

  • Recent Comments

    • Jason Morgan: When my wife read your comment she immediately began recanting stories about how horrible day care was...
    • Jason Morgan: Unfortunately, Starbucks no longer brews anything regularly aside from Pike’s Place Blend (which...
    • Greg Molyneux: I’m going to go out on a limb here and make a more or less baseless assumption—most people do...
    • Jason Morgan: Thoughts on “corporate” coffees, such as Starbucks, that offer Fair Trade and Organic beans?
    • Jason Morgan: I agree with most of what you said except that you are missing a fundamental piece of information in...
  • Follow @Babeled

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.